Most retirement planning advice is written for a
hypothetical person with a continuous career, steady earnings growth, a spouse
with similar financial standing, and a retirement that starts at 65 and lasts
about twenty years. That person exists. She's just not the majority of women.
The structural realities of women's financial lives
make retirement planning a genuinely different exercise — not harder,
necessarily, but different in ways that require different analysis. The
standard advice isn't wrong. It's just incomplete.
The longevity gap is the most significant difference
and the most underplanned for. Women live longer than men on average — not by a
little, but by several years. That means a retirement that needs to fund more
years, more healthcare costs, more inflation exposure, and a longer period of
solo living. A plan built on a twenty-year retirement horizon that actually
needs to cover twenty-eight years isn't just slightly underfunded. The
compounding effect of that gap is substantial.




